patching...
Breaking: Longshot Oxbow Wins Preakness Stakes »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

UPDATED: Loch Raven High Speed Camera Vandalized For Second Time

A speed camera on Cromwell Bridge Road has been vandalized for the second time in a month.

 

A speed camera on Cromwell Bridge Road near Loch Raven High School was vandalized overnight and, according to a repairman, is currently non-operational.

The camera, which was vandalized for the first time on Aug. 17, was spray-painted. The camera housing and the ground around the camera have the number 2013 scrawled in silver and orange paint.

The plastic covering the camera lens was painted opaque in orange and silver, and the area where the flashbulbs sit was damaged.

The camera was damaged between 5:30 and 7 a.m. Sept. 7, according to Cpl. Cathleen Batton, a Baltimore County Police spokeswoman. Batton said the company responsible for maintaining the cameras had been contacted and would be replacing the damaged camera housing.

When the camera was damaged back in August, police spokeswoman Elise Armacost said that the camera vendor, ACS, is responsible for repairing damage to the cameras.

Back in April, a speed camera on Rolling Road in Catonsville was set on fire and later, in June, that same camera was found spray-painted in much the same way the one near Loch Raven was.

The camera on Cromwell Bridge Road is one of the five that recently became operational on Aug. 8.

Related Topics: September Week 1 In Review, Speed Camera Vandalism, and Speed Camera Vandalized

number9dream

10:15 am on Friday, September 7, 2012

I like the graffiti motif, but silver and orange are so 70's.

Reply

M. Sullivan

10:33 am on Friday, September 7, 2012

HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa !!!!

Reply

Needaname

10:34 am on Friday, September 7, 2012

There seems to be a lot of traffic in that area. I am amazed that someone was able to paint the box 2X and not be seen.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Heavy

10:55 am on Friday, September 7, 2012

Needaname- It's almost pitch black at night back there behind the school. You could almost steal the thing and walk away with no one seeing. .

Heavy

10:50 am on Friday, September 7, 2012

It's not right that County put the dang thing right near the bottom of a Hill, in the back of the school no less. Should have gone up IN FRONT OF THE SCHOOL. They placed it at the exact point where they figured they could the most money in fines, NOT WHERE IT WOULD MAKE THE CHILDREN THE SAFEST. IT'S A MONEY GRAB BY THE STATE- PURE AND SIMPLE- Move it to the front, there would be no problems....

Reply

Thomas

11:00 am on Friday, September 7, 2012

Everybody saw it yet nobody saw it, tax payers little secret. I heard ACS is hiring.

Reply

Harry Callahan

11:08 am on Friday, September 7, 2012

The next thing you know is that the people who receive tickets from this thing will complain to the judge that the county painted it in a camoflage pattern to hide it from passing motorists. I think that the county should just clean off the glass at the business end of the camera and leave it as is.

Reply

JDStuts

11:30 am on Friday, September 7, 2012

I love civil disobedience. This renews my faith in the human spirit.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tim

11:47 am on Friday, September 7, 2012

That's criminal disobedience, not civil.

Comment_arrow

JDStuts

12:06 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012

Eh, some laws are morally wrong.

Just because something is codified by the government does not mean it is correct. Japanese interment based on 'suspicion' comes to mind, as does voter IDs. Also remember, spousal abuse was for decades considered unprosecutable.

Revenue cameras certainly fall into this grey area.

Comment_arrow

Tim

4:52 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012

Morals don't override the law, JD.

You can decide they do, and you're always free to do so, but that makes you a criminal.

Of course, I disagree with you on the 'revenue' cameras. There's nothing wrong with - out in public - enforcing the laws on the books through whatever reasonable means neccessary. No one is forcing you to leadfoot it past that 'revenue' camera.

What the real crime is, honestly, is how little money the county actually gets.

Comment_arrow

Evets

5:48 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012

Civil disobedience involves the willingness to suffer the consequences of the disobedience. Gandhi practiced civil disobedience and paid the price. Martin Luther King JR. practiced CD and paid the price. The draft resisters of the 60s practiced CD and paid a price. If the person who vandalized the camera views this as CD, he/she ought to come forward, state his/her position on speed cameras to convince others he is right, and accept the consequences. Otherwise, its just vandalism

Comment_arrow

Evets

9:45 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012

Tim, I do not often disagree with you, but your statement that, "Morals don't override the law" inclines me to comment. Some laws are morally wrong and do call for civil disobedience. The Jim Crow laws prevelant in our country decades ago are just the most obvious example. Martin Luther King, Jr. and his associates disbeyed those laws, which did make them criminals, but I believe they were morally right. The citizens of this country agreed and these laws were overturned and are now no more than an historical embarrasment.

I certainly would not label laws regarding enforcement of the speed limit to be morally wrong, nor do I believe that it is morally wrong to monitor and enforce speed limits via cameras. I agree with you that disregarding the warnings about the cameras and failing to slow down amounts to a voluntary contribution to the tax revenues of Baltimore County.

Parkvillehoney

11:32 am on Friday, September 7, 2012

Why don't they put the camera at an elevated height? The ground level camera is a temptation for jerks that want to vandalize. So sad.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Heavy

11:42 am on Friday, September 7, 2012

Hey Honey..They should put where it makes the CHILDREN THE MOST SAFE at that school. Behind the school, above back parking lot, not there for safety reason. It's there for $$ generation only. SAFETY IS NOT DRIVING FORCE HERE.

Comment_arrow

JDStuts

11:47 am on Friday, September 7, 2012

It doesn't make as much money at a higher angle. Oops, I mean slow down cars. Wait it doesn't do that either, it just takes a picture.

What is the purpose of these things again?

Comment_arrow

Tim

11:52 am on Friday, September 7, 2012

Once again, there'd be no driving force if you terribad Maryland drivers would stop driving like you own the road.

Once profits are down, you'll be surprised at how they gradually disappear.

Stop sucking at driving, Baltimore County.
Also, stop sucking at parking, while you are at it.

- No, you don't deserve a handicapped parking space without your own tag,
- No, that fire lane you park in wasn't designed for your personal use.
- Those lines on your parking space? They are there to help guide you into the space. Pay attention.
- Finally, push your carts back where they belong after you use them, instead of leaving them in the street, you lazy bunch of entitled babies.

Comment_arrow

JDStuts

12:07 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012

"- Finally, push your carts back where they belong after you use them, instead of leaving them in the street, you lazy bunch of entitled babies."

Truer words have never been spoken.

number9dream

12:36 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012

@Tim

After reading this:

"Stop sucking at driving, Baltimore County.
Also, stop sucking at parking, while you are at it."

I couldn't help but recall this:

"Stay classy, Loch Raven."

Stay classy, Tim.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tim

5:14 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012

I do none of these things enumerated above. Ever.
Still, there's no question I lack class.

There's no way I could properly set up a dinner table. I seldom wear a tie as well, or even dress slacks. Sometimes, I even eat with my hands. What I don't lack, however, is integrity and consideration of others and the law, when I'm operating a motor vehicle.

Parkvillehoney

4:39 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012

With Maryland being the #1 state with the worst drivers and the highest auto rates, I believe speed cameras in front of schools and cameras mounted on school buses are necessary. We need to slow down these agressive drivers. You don't have enough police to catch everyone. Is it going to take the death of a child to slow drivers down to the posted speed and to stop for a school bus with its lights on?

Reply
Comment_arrow

AllStar

11:26 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012

The highest accidents are because Baltimore City and Washington are two of the most congested places in the country.

Comment_arrow

Parkvillehoney

1:17 am on Saturday, September 8, 2012

Sorry, Allstar, don't believe congestion for one minute. Some Maryland drivers I have encountered drive aggressively, cutting from one lane to another to get ahead, driving way over 65 miles on major highways, running red lights, tailgating, and texting on their phones. All this unsafe behavior leads to accidents.

Mike Pierce

7:52 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012

This camera is at the end of a long stretch of country roads (all the way from Harford County) mostly with higher speed limits. Suddenly the limit drops to 30, while one is still among the tree-lined Cromwell Bridge Rd - no major build-up of civilization ins sight. Drivers either don't notice the first 30 MPH sign in the tress, or presume it's been misplaced. Then there is another sign, but, by then, it's pretty much too late. The camera should be moved further to the west, in front of the school, after drivers can be expected to really realize that they are in an area that really requires the 30 MPH limit. And put it higher up.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Evets

8:41 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012

Actually, there is a sign warning that the speed limit is reduced ahead. There is also a sign, easy to see if one is watching the road, that the speed limit is 30 and the speed limit is enforced by a camera. Failure to slow down here is just deciding to volunteer to contribute to the Baltimore County coffers. Also, the speed limit prior to approaching the school (from the north) is 40, so if you are adhering to the posted speed and do not slow down, you are still under the cushion the speed cameras give before taking your picture. Slow down and relax.

Comment_arrow

Evets

8:43 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012

Not noticing a sign or presuming it is misplaced is a sorry excuse for failing to slow down.

Comment_arrow

Other Tim

9:52 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012

The speed limit on Glen Arm Road before you turn onto Cromwell Bridge Road is 30mph. It then is 40mph for only about 2 miles.(BTW, who in their right mind would assume a speed limit sign is "misplaced"?) If you are doing 40 mph (or even 50) as you approach the first 30mph sign on Cromwell bridge Road, there is a hill. You would need to hit the gas to continue your current speed. The hill has enough of an upgrade that if you took your foot off the gas, you would probably not even make it to the top of the hill. If you were doing 50 as you crested the hill, and then took your foot off the gas, you would be doing less than 42 before the camera picked up your speed, because after coming down the hill, you must then go up another hill before passing the camera. You really must have no concept of obeying the law if this camera gets you.

Comment_arrow

Evets

10:04 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012

Other Tim, I agree. And since you cannot see over that hill as you approach it, slowing down would be the safe thing to do. I have ridden hundreds of miles on that road on my bicycle. If you drive much over 40 on Cromwell Bridge Road, you are not driving carefully or courteously

AllStar

11:22 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012

Is there a fund to support the vandals? How can I donate?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Gas Giant

5:36 am on Saturday, September 8, 2012

You could always buy a few cans of spray paint and leave them there on top of the speed camera box so that the artists who are trying to express themselves have easy access to new material.

Buck Harmon

8:35 am on Saturday, September 8, 2012

I like idea of matte finish black....applied carefully to the lens only..after months of no money being generated they would check the camera, and the paint job would be old news...

Reply

DougW

1:11 pm on Saturday, September 8, 2012

The one on Seven Courts Dr at Seven Oaks was vandalized overnight Sept 7-8 with paint on the glass and back of the cabinet. One of these days, they will add a camera to watch the camera.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Gas Giant

7:32 pm on Saturday, September 8, 2012

How do you know that they haven't already done this? MU-AH-HA-HA-HA-Ha! Just get one of those little game camera's that hunters use to watch for deer. They have infra-red capabilities and with an 8 GB memory card they can shoot many pictures.

Comment_arrow

Dave

3:59 pm on Sunday, September 9, 2012

And then a camera to watch the camera that's watching the camera!

Other Tim

7:32 pm on Saturday, September 8, 2012

All you people who think it's fun to vanalize the speed cameras are probably the same ones who think you are being cute by changing speed limit signs from "30" to "80".
It's time to grow up and act responsibly.

Reply

Moe green

8:10 pm on Saturday, September 8, 2012

This country was born out of treason against a tyrannical king. People are tired of government doing anything they can because they can.
The painters are striking back at an oppressive goverment set on confiscating more of our hard earned money.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Evets

10:02 pm on Saturday, September 8, 2012

Yeah, it's tyranny to expect citizens to travel at the posted speed limit, a speed limit BTW that has not changed in decades. Ranks right up there with quartering soldiers in our homes and denying us the right to trade with any nation other than England.

Evets

10:28 pm on Saturday, September 8, 2012

Also, as I remember, the leaders of that treason against that tyrannical king signed their names to some document or other so the king would know who they were. I must have missed where these folks vandalizing cameras came forward to state their position against our oppressive government and urge all citizens to stand with them against this current tyranny.

Reply

ralahinn1

8:19 am on Sunday, September 9, 2012

I hope the vandals are properly dressed, that they are wearing Guy Fawkes masks ( or ski masks) and hoodies, to keep the camera from spotting them, and that they are healthy enough to outrun " the law" that may be hidden near by( or they can spot a second security cam that may be set up near that location in the future, if someone gets smart).

Reply

Buck Harmon

8:44 am on Sunday, September 9, 2012

I would consider this type of art , freely expressing...non violent...effective..more effective than the profiteering that is the goal of their use. If you don't agree with this type of expression, catch them if you can...life is like a game of "Chutes and Ladders".
live with it or sit on a tack!

Reply

chsmm1

11:38 am on Sunday, September 9, 2012

If these speed cameras were around when I was a teenager...they would have been dismantled completely and each time they were replaced they would have been taken down again .. these cameras are a joke..

Reply

Evets

5:11 pm on Sunday, September 9, 2012

I am not a big fan of speed cameras, nor I am in favor of vandalism. People want to practice true civil disobedience, here is an idea. Put together a rally/protest against the cameras at the location of the cameras. Carry lots of signs that show displeasure with the cameras, big signs, and make sure the protesters are constantly in front of the cameras so that any cars travelling by cannot be photographed. The protesters should be nothing if not peaceful and polite. If this sort of protest is for some reason illegal, all the better. Force the police to arrest some protesters. The protesters should go to jail peacefully. Organize another protest soon after. This is civil disobedience. If it is true that most citizens want to get rid of the cameras, the constant protests will have their intended effect.

Sounds more effective than the constant vandalism.

Reply

Buck Harmon

5:32 pm on Sunday, September 9, 2012

Maybe they should hire more police to police the camera's that take the place of police...

Reply

Leave a comment