patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!
Local Voices

Change of Heart: Why I Now Support Elected School Board

I was appointed to the Baltimore County Board of Education in 2005. I applied several times. I am very outspoken for what I believe to be in the best interest of students so I am not always politically sensitive. I am sure I was not the first choice in 2005 to be appointed to the board.

Why did I apply for an unpaid Board of Education postion that demands countless hours if done properly? 

I applied for it because I thought that I could make a difference. I spent 15 years as an education volunteer in Baltimore County Public Schools as a Pine Grove Middle School school improvement team participant, Parkville High School school improvement team; multiple stints as treasurer and president of the Parkville High School PTA, member and chair of the NE Area Educational Advisory Council, Evening High School Study Committee, Elementary Report Card Committee, Calendar Committee, and Coordinator for the five Education Advisory Councils. 

I have served as the president of the Carney Improvement Association for about 10 years. I know that the public schools are the center of the community and that the students sitting in the community classrooms are critical to the success of Baltimore County's and the nation's future.

I also applied because I visited a "standard" high school history classroom at Parkville High School during American Education Week in 1999 and I was horrified at the low level of student learning in the class room, the low expectations of the teacher and  students talking and trying to distract other students who were trying to pay attention.

Why did I change my mind and now think that an elected Baltimore County school board is the only way to go?

I was told by all who "were knowledgeable" including other appointed board members, board presidents, community activists, superintendents and local elected officials that an appointed Board of Education was "the only way to go." I even testified in Annapolis about five years ago in favor of keeping the School Board in Baltimore County appointed. I was a "newbie" to the board so I bought into the incorrect logic that appointment for Board of Education members was the "way to go."

As a Board of Education member, I always tried to focused on students and student achievement. I attended Maryland Association of Boards of Education training (which not many board members do now). During my tenure as a board member, I served on the Curriculum Committee, the Policy Committee, and the Budget and Audit Committee. I attended as many student-focused BCPS events as I could for five years. I did what I thought I was supposed to do as a school board member, including attend BCPS graduations to certify that graduates completed Maryland high school requirements. Some members had to be practically begged to attend graduations.

I noticed that the school board members being appointed were purely political:  Don Mohler's friend from BCPS; Don Mohler's neighbor; former Baltimore County Government employee and wife of an Annapolis lobbyist whose student graduated from a private school; Baltimore County development attorney in practice with Jim Smith's son (and now Jim Smith) who was formerly Baltimore County Liquor Board chair and zoning commissioner; former State Sen, Michael Collins (who worked on Kamenetz's campaign); and finally Kevin Kamenetz's attorney friend.

I also noticed that high ranking BCPS employees retired and went to work for Baltimore County Government. Notably, Anthony Marchione and Don Mohler.  I noticed a few employees moving between jobs in BCPS and Baltimore County Government. Notably, Barry Williams and Bob Barrett. There may be more, but I am not aware of any more.

I have watched Board of Education meetings on television this year. I am appalled at the leadership. The board president is supposed to run the meeting, not dominate it. Then there is the board member who acts clown-like, seeming disengaged from the Board meeting. 

What are these political appointments interested in? They seem to want to do the will of Baltimore County executive and his cronies first and what is best for children was OK if it was in line with what county government wanted. 

No longer were school board members being appointed, who were active in their communities or with education expertise who were ordinary citizens being appointed. No more were appointments the caliber of Rodger Janssen, JoAnn Murphy, Warren Hayman, Joy Shillman, Fran Harris, Phyllis Ettinger being appointed who worked for a cared about the students. Instead it became a game of political connections. 

Other reasons? Too much control by the county executive over which schools get a 20th century amenity like air conditioning. There is no land to build schools in areas where large housing developments have been added along the York Road eorridor? 

(By the way, do you know why there is no land for schools?  Because Baltimore County school board members did not speak up in years gone by to demand that Baltimore County government require developers pay impact fees or set aside land for schools.  In other Maryland counties developers were required to pay impact fees to cover the cost of public infrastructure, such as schools and recreation space.

Baltimore County is the darling of developers because developers do not have to provide any land or money for public infrastructure. That is why wherever there is development there is overcrowding of schools. Also at fault is an inadequate and inappropriate adequate facilities law that defines a school as overcrowded only after the student population is at 115 percent of the physical capacity that the school was designed to house. 

That is why so many school in Baltimore County have trailers as a permanent fixture on the school property. The 15 percent of students greater than the 100 percent physical capacity have to go somewhere! Then-councilman Joe Bartenfelder tried to address this problem with legislation to change the adequate facilities trigger to a more reasonable figure, but of course, his fellow councilmen tabled the legislation.)

So yes, I changed my mind. I am not longer a sheep who "chants" the appoined school board mantra. I have allowed my experience to guide me to the logical opinion that the Board of Education of Baltimore County should be elected just as 96 percent of boards of education in the U.S. are elected.

Ron Burgundy

3:57 pm on Friday, April 20, 2012

Looks like we hit a little nerve there Ms. Meg, interesting. So NOW you've had a change of heart.NOW that you're no longer on the school board. Were you appalled about the $7MILLION MISTAKE AT MILFORD MILL. Were you appalled by the Harriston grading fiasco, all of which occurred on YOUR WATCH. I'm so glad to have someone of your talent go into Parkville HS and assess the level of learing , given your extensive history in education. Being a "go fer" hardly gives you the curriculum vitae to assess levels of learning. And, with ALL of your background how could you possibly miss a $7 MILLION DOLLAR mistake. Not $700,000, maybe that could be explained but $7 MILLION. I suppose you were out assessing the learning levels of the other schools at that time and just missed it.
Is it possible the ONLY way for you to attempt to be on the board again is by election and this is your agenda? Again I say, you are the Mitt Romney of Baltimore County, without the elevator.

Reply

Paul Romney

9:00 am on Saturday, April 21, 2012

I am not intimately involved in local government; however, from what I have seen, I am inclined to credit Ms. O'Hare's analysis. It is at least straightforward, cogent, and backed up by facts -- unlike the sarcastic rejoinder of "Ron Burgundy".

I too have been reluctant to embrace the idea of an elected board. My son experienced BCPS education at what must be close to its best, and I was reluctant to tamper with a system that seemed to be working. However, recent appointments to and by the school board have caused me to question the merits of the status quo.

The next year or two should be very interesting.

Reply

Baltimore County Parent

12:32 pm on Saturday, April 21, 2012

Meg O'Hare totally hits the nail on the head here! I was initially skeptical of her change of heart but she has now won me over. Her analysis of all the recent political appointments is dead on. But the most important piece - and one that requires MUCH MORE discussion - is the need for developer impact fees and why the lack of them has caused all of our overcrowding and infrastructure problems. Kudos to Ms. O'Hare for such a revealing and thoughtful analysis.

Reply

Ron Burgundy

1:44 pm on Saturday, April 21, 2012

Ms O'hare is interested in one and one thing only her "anti" agenda. Her entire tenure can be described as "take blame for nothing and credit for everything.When she was appointed she never uttered a sentence about an elected board,now she's got religion. Don't buy it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

D Flynn

1:57 pm on Saturday, April 21, 2012

Ron, I've always loved your candor and unbiased insight. Thanks, honey!

J. Sillman

5:25 pm on Tuesday, April 24, 2012

Excellent discussion about an elected school board. Meg does speak from experience and has every right and reason to change her mind. I give her credit for an excellent and honest analysis. J. Silman

Reply

Meg O'Hare

11:59 am on Tuesday, May 1, 2012

Is D.Flynn another disgruntled BCPS employee?

Reply

BCPS teacher

9:38 am on Friday, July 6, 2012

In 1776, we made a declaration that government was to be chosen by the people. President Lincoln reaffirmed this idea in 1863. The Board of Education has governmental authority and I am unaware of any exclusionary clause for its operation. Simply put, it is contrary to the ideals of our country to have an unelected board.

Reply

Leave a comment