Towson-Area Delegates React to Same-Sex Marriage Vote

In emails to their constituents, Dels. Susan Aumann and Steve Lafferty posted two very different reactions to the bill.


Following the House of Delegates passage last week of a bill to allow same-sex marriage in Maryland, two Towson-area delegates sent two very different emails to constituents.

The 42nd district delegates split on the issue, with Democrat Steve Lafferty voting for the bill and Republican Susan Aumann (as well as colleague Bill Frank) voting against it.

The Civil Marriage Protection Act now goes to the state Senate, which passed the bill last year and is likely to do so again. Sen. James Brochin, a Towson Democrat, voted for last year's bill.

Lafferty, a Stoneleigh resident and co-sponsor of the measure, said the bill caused much soul-searching among his colleagues in a statement emailed to residents and posted on the Forge Flyer.

On Friday, the House of Delegates passed HB 438, the Civil Marriage Protection Act, recognizing the right of two individuals to be married! I was proud to be a co-sponsor and thrilled to see this pass, putting Maryland on the path to legalizing same-sex marriage. It is a step towards greater justice and equality for those who love each other and wish to commit themselves to one another.

This bill and vote caused all delegates to search our hearts and souls to do what each thought is right. Many of us, while strongly disagreeing with our colleagues, tried to be non-judgmental and respectful. And, for the seven gay legislators, the political is very personal. The passions and tensions have been high for weeks. This past week, however, there were threats and accusations hurled about, more venomous phone calls and emails to legislators and even a threat against one delegate that led to the need for a police escort. State troopers were throughout our building on Thursday and Friday as a precaution! That was pretty shocking.

Now, the bill moves to the Senate for a vote. Since it passed the Senate last year, it is expected to pass again and then be signed into law by the Governor. That will be another remarkable day. However, it is fully expected to then be petitioned to referendum for the voters to decide in November where I hope our decision will be affirmed.

In Aumann's email to constituents, the delegate said Gov. Martin O'Malley supported the Civil Marriage Protection Act solely to boost his national profile.

The Governor is pushing his same sex marriage bill and he knows that by passing it here in Maryland it would look great on his political resume. In fact the Washington Post stated "Perhaps no other O'Malley effort is being watched as closely nationally as same-sex marriage." I find it extremely appalling that O'Malley is using and abusing our state to advance his own national political agenda to the detriment of our Maryland families. For those who are ambivalent, thinking that "this won't affect me,"  the consequences of passing gay marriage will permeate many aspects of our society. The definition of marriage does not need to be redefined. I support traditional marriage, one man and one woman, and here is why:

  • Traditional marriage builds families-mom, dad, and children-and gives hope that the next generations will carry that family into the future.
  • In states where marriage has been redefined, activists have implemented a homosexual agenda in the schools to children as young as kindergarten. I am opposed to promoting gay marriage in our public schools and once it is "legal" in this state the curriculum will follow the law.
  • The people of Maryland don't need the legislature to tell them what marriage is.  Marriage is an institution of the people, not politicians, and the legislature should know better than to try and take the definition of marriage away from them.

This legislation has taken a front seat this session and it is the biggest family issue we are facing, but I know it is not the ONLY issue. I know that the taxes and fees, which the Governor is proposing, are an assault on your way of life and I am in Annapolis fighting for you.

Terri Czarski February 21, 2012 at 06:57 PM
Bravo to Del. Lafferty for standing up for equality for Maryland citizens. It saddens me that so many who voted "no" are so deliberately uninformed. In particular, it galls me that so many are basing decisions on their religious beliefs rather than Constitutional provisions.
PatchReader February 22, 2012 at 04:09 AM
Well said. I agree 100 percent.
Pat Gill February 22, 2012 at 01:29 PM
The choice of language in modern legislation and the failure to include language to clarify legislation, are tools that the left routinely uses, intentionally, to "kick the can" of the meaning of legislation forward to the most liberal "legislatures" in our country, liberal courts. The lawsuits that "broaden" legislation beyond the intentions of the majority, even the majority in the legislatures that passed the legislation (although that is not typically the case in Maryland where the legislature is slightly to the left of Stalin), then are frequently subsidized by tax dollars. So why is it a surprise to the left that legislation that appears to be modest in its goals is treated by the right the way that the "Trojan horse" should have been treated. Who, by the way, in "deliberately uninformed", whatever that means? As for "constitutional provisions", if there was a "constitutional provision" that, as determined by the Maryland Court of Appeals, did what this legislation is supposed to do, then would it not follow logically that this legislation is unnecessary.
Bart February 22, 2012 at 04:45 PM
Fully agree, Juliet. Thank you. I applaud Lafferty; Aumann and Frank will never get my vote again. Aumann has embarassed herself, and Frank, as usual, has nothing to say.
John L. February 23, 2012 at 12:57 PM
I must agree with Ms. Aumann, our Governor is out for himself in all respects. As for equality, I don't see the reason to treat the applause for S. Lafferty as positive. Civil Unions would have been nice. 'Marriage' is now laughable, the definition has always been between a man and a woman, why do we have to destroy that? Heart wrenching, soul searching - I don't buy that for a second. We live in a very sad time.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »