Regulation Proposed To Reduce Pollution From Septic Systems & Increase Water Quality

MDE proposed a new regulation that requires nitrogen-removal technology for all septic systems serving new construction on land draining to the Chesapeake Bay and Atlantic Coastal Bays.


Action identified as necessary to meet federally mandated water quality standards


BALTIMORE, MD (April 27, 2012) – The Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) proposed a new regulation today to require nitrogen-removal technology for all septic systems serving new construction on land draining to the Chesapeake Bay and Atlantic Coastal Bays or in other areas where bodies of water are impaired by nitrogen. Existing regulations require nitrogen removal technology for all new and replacement septic systems in the Critical Area.

“Since 2008, we have spent more than $40 million to retrofit thousands of septic systems in Maryland, but this investment has been completely negated by new septic system installations. Septic systems are one of the few sources for which nitrogen pollution continues to increase,” said MDE Secretary Robert M. Summers. “Thanks to the leadership of Governor O’Malley and the Maryland General Assembly, we made great progress during the 2012 legislative session toward limiting the impact of septic system development on Maryland’s waters, farmlands and forests. By requiring technology that reduces nitrogen discharges by half or more on more new septic systems, we are one step closer toward reaching our goal of a restored and healthy Chesapeake Bay.”Under the Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL), Maryland must reduce the nutrients nitrogen and phosphorus, along with sediments, in order to reach water quality standards by 2025. Maryland’s Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan, the action plan for achieving this goal, was submitted to the EPA on March 30, 2012.

This proposed regulation was a recommendation of the Task Force on Sustainable Growth and Wastewater Disposal. It supports, enhances and reinforces the Sustainable Growth and Agricultural Preservation Act of 2012, which will be signed into law on Wednesday, May 2.

The proposed regulation has been submitted for approval to the Joint Committee on Administrative, Executive and Legislative Review (AELR). It also establishes minimum operation and maintenance requirements for the life of the upgraded technology to ensure that these septic systems do not fall into disrepair and damage the environment. Companies who either install and/or maintain the nitrogen-removing technologies will have to complete a course of study approved by MDE and be certified by the manufacturer.

These septic systems on new construction are eligible for funding from the Bay Restoration Fund, but funding may be limited due to the current priorities for the use of the fund.  Funding from the Bay Restoration Fund has helped pay for 3,132 septic systems in Maryland to be upgraded with nitrogen-removal technology. 



This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Buck Harmon April 28, 2012 at 01:27 PM
I think that it's great to protect the bay from too much nitrogen.....as I see thousands of acres being sprayed with urea in heavily concentrated doses on hillsides that lead to streams. And then they follow with petro chemical herbicides to scorch the earth of living matter....followed by specially developed insecticides applied several times throughout the year. Monsanto must back this kind of regulation on home owners. Their products are being applied to a field near you...today.
Buck Harmon April 28, 2012 at 01:30 PM
Why not just mandate composting toilets for all new home construction and pass the savings on to the consumer....?
Hans-Adam III, Prince of Liechtenstein April 28, 2012 at 01:49 PM
Yes the liberal radical environmentalists' war on farmers, business, property owners and homeowners is alive and well. Why don't the environmentalists say what they really mean? They don't want any more people impacting the bay since people are a toxic scourge on nature. The environmentalist big and small property owners don'y want any new development or redevelopment to occur since restricting it will make their real estate holdings more valuable.
Buck Harmon April 28, 2012 at 02:06 PM
The government leads the war on farmers by control....the government is owned by the petro chemical industry to a great degree....the government needs to be reined in with regard to control, not expanded...we all lose with the expansion of government control.
Karl Schuub April 28, 2012 at 03:22 PM
This is such a difficult issue - framing it as a war on farmers or developers and such on the one hand is a war on sports fishing and fisherman, wildlife and estuaries on the other. Seems nobody gets to "win" if we want to control the continuing slide in water quality in the bay.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »